Friday Afternoon Pairs Friday Aft Session May 13, 2016
Scores after  6 rounds  Average:   60.0      Section  A  North-South
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  4   61.25   73.50  A   1                0.60(A)  Bruce Busby - Brian Busby
  1   60.42   72.50  A   2                0.42(A)  Gill Schramm - Annette Miller
  3   58.33   70.00  A                             Kathy Boothroyd - Jerry Boothroyd
  2   46.25   55.50  B         1          0.12(B)  Peter Larsson - Patricia Marini
  6   44.17   53.00  A                             Doreen Ransom - Colin Ransom
  5   29.58   35.50  C                             Lail Weeks - Eleanor Bowcock

Friday Afternoon Pairs Friday Aft Session May 13, 2016
Scores after  6 rounds  Average:   60.0      Section  A  East-West
Pair    Pct   Score      Section Rank      MPs
                         A     B     C
  1   63.33   76.00  A   1                0.60(A)  Anna Crouch - Val Breen
  5   53.33   64.00  B   2     1          0.42(A)  Peter Leveque - Cecil Van Sickle
  3   50.00   60.00  A                             Joan Sobieniak - Marie Lamontagne
  2   45.00   54.00  B         2          0.17(B)  Marlene Russell - Harvey Russell
  4   44.58   53.50  B                             Karen Chelswick - Thea Reardon
  6   43.75   52.50  B                             Betty Watson - Michael Moore



Board 1
North Deals
None Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS♣ 631505.000.004-Busby-Busby vs 2-Russell-Russell
2 ♠N K31403.501.502-Larsson-Marini vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
2 ♠N♣ J31403.501.506-Ransom-Ransom vs 6-Watson-Moore
2 NTS 321201.503.503-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
2 NTS 321201.503.505-Weeks-Bowcock vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
3 NTN 10−31500.005.001-Schramm-Miller vs 1-Crouch-Breen

Board 2
East Deals
N-S Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTN K21204.500.503-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
2 NTS♠ Q21204.500.504-Busby-Busby vs 2-Russell-Russell
2 N♠ 521103.002.002-Larsson-Marini vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
2 ♠W♣ A−1501.503.501-Schramm-Miller vs 1-Crouch-Breen
2 ♠W♣ A−1501.503.505-Weeks-Bowcock vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
2 N 10−11000.005.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 6-Watson-Moore

Board 3
South Deals
E-W Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♣×E A−411005.000.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 6-Watson-Moore
1 NTS 531503.501.501-Schramm-Miller vs 1-Crouch-Breen
2 NTS 731503.501.504-Busby-Busby vs 2-Russell-Russell
2 N Q21102.003.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
3 ♠S J−1500.504.502-Larsson-Marini vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
2 NTS 7−1500.504.505-Weeks-Bowcock vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon

Board 4
West Deals
Both Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
5 ♣S♠ K66205.000.001-Schramm-Miller vs 1-Crouch-Breen
3 ♠W A−22004.001.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
4 N♠ J61702.502.502-Larsson-Marini vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
3 ♣S♠ K61702.502.503-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
3 N♠ J51501.004.004-Busby-Busby vs 2-Russell-Russell
3 ♠W K−11000.005.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 6-Watson-Moore

Board 5
North Deals
N-S Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
7 ♠S♣ 9722105.000.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
6 ♠S 3714604.001.004-Busby-Busby vs 1-Crouch-Breen
6 NTN 8614403.002.001-Schramm-Miller vs 6-Watson-Moore
3 NTN J77202.003.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
5 ♠S 277101.004.002-Larsson-Marini vs 2-Russell-Russell
6 ♠S 6−22000.005.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne

Board 6
East Deals
E-W Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTW 41905.000.002-Larsson-Marini vs 2-Russell-Russell
4 S 3−21004.001.004-Busby-Busby vs 1-Crouch-Breen
2 W♠ 231402.003.001-Schramm-Miller vs 6-Watson-Moore
2 W♣ J31402.003.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
3 W 931402.003.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
2 E 341700.005.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne

Board 7
South Deals
Both Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTE A−33005.000.001-Schramm-Miller vs 6-Watson-Moore
2 N 1041704.001.004-Busby-Busby vs 1-Crouch-Breen
4 ♣E A−11003.002.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
2 ♣E A41301.503.505-Weeks-Bowcock vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
3 ♣W A41301.503.506-Ransom-Ransom vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
2 ♣E 551500.005.002-Larsson-Marini vs 2-Russell-Russell

Board 8
West Deals
None Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ♠N Q−21004.001.002-Larsson-Marini vs 2-Russell-Russell
3 N Q−21004.001.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
3 N Q−21004.001.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
3 W A31102.003.001-Schramm-Miller vs 6-Watson-Moore
1 NTE♠ 421201.004.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
3 NTE♠ 934000.005.004-Busby-Busby vs 1-Crouch-Breen

Board 9
North Deals
E-W Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTS A21205.000.001-Schramm-Miller vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
1 W♣ 8−11003.501.503-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
2 W Q−11003.501.504-Busby-Busby vs 6-Watson-Moore
1 NTS 41902.003.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
1 NTS 4−1501.004.002-Larsson-Marini vs 1-Crouch-Breen
2 W 1031400.005.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 2-Russell-Russell

Board 10
East Deals
Both Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N 246205.000.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
3 NTE 6−22004.001.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
1 ♠S 321103.002.001-Schramm-Miller vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
1 ♠S♣ 21802.003.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 2-Russell-Russell
1 ♠S♣ 10−22001.004.004-Busby-Busby vs 6-Watson-Moore
3 NTE♠ 546300.005.002-Larsson-Marini vs 1-Crouch-Breen

Board 11
South Deals
None Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTS 275204.500.504-Busby-Busby vs 6-Watson-Moore
3 NTN 675204.500.505-Weeks-Bowcock vs 2-Russell-Russell
5 ♣N♠ 674402.502.501-Schramm-Miller vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
5 ♣N J74402.502.506-Ransom-Ransom vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
4 ♣N 461701.004.002-Larsson-Marini vs 1-Crouch-Breen
3 ♣N J51500.005.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne

Board 12
West Deals
N-S Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
1 NTW 41905.000.004-Busby-Busby vs 6-Watson-Moore
2 ♣W 1031104.001.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 2-Russell-Russell
1 NTW 421203.002.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
2 ♣W 941302.003.001-Schramm-Miller vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
1 NTW♠ 531500.504.502-Larsson-Marini vs 1-Crouch-Breen
1 NTW 931500.504.506-Ransom-Ransom vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon

Board 13
North Deals
Both Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW 8−11005.000.002-Larsson-Marini vs 6-Watson-Moore
3 ♣E J31104.001.001-Schramm-Miller vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
2 NTW 831502.502.503-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 2-Russell-Russell
2 NTW J31502.502.506-Ransom-Ransom vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
3 NTW J36000.504.504-Busby-Busby vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
3 NTW 936000.504.505-Weeks-Bowcock vs 1-Crouch-Breen

Board 14
East Deals
None Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 ×W Q−11004.500.504-Busby-Busby vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
3 NTW 5−21004.500.506-Ransom-Ransom vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
3 ♠E 10−1502.502.502-Larsson-Marini vs 6-Watson-Moore
3 ♠E 3−1502.502.503-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 2-Russell-Russell
3 S♣ 6−1501.004.001-Schramm-Miller vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
3 NTE 534000.005.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 1-Crouch-Breen

Board 15
South Deals
N-S Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 N♣ 356504.001.001-Schramm-Miller vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
4 N♣ 756504.001.002-Larsson-Marini vs 6-Watson-Moore
4 N♣ 356504.001.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 2-Russell-Russell
4 N♣ 346201.004.004-Busby-Busby vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
4 N♣ 346201.004.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 1-Crouch-Breen
4 N♠ 746201.004.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne

Board 16
West Deals
E-W Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTW 5−22005.000.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 2-Russell-Russell
2 N♣ A21104.001.004-Busby-Busby vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
2 E Q−11003.002.001-Schramm-Miller vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
2 ♣W A41302.003.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 1-Crouch-Breen
3 NTW 536000.504.502-Larsson-Marini vs 6-Watson-Moore
3 NTW 536000.504.506-Ransom-Ransom vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne

Board 17
North Deals
None Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
3 NTN 644304.500.501-Schramm-Miller vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
3 NTN 644304.500.506-Ransom-Ransom vs 2-Russell-Russell
3 NTN 834002.502.502-Larsson-Marini vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
3 NTN 634002.502.504-Busby-Busby vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
2 NTN 641801.004.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 6-Watson-Moore
3 NTS Q−1500.005.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 1-Crouch-Breen

Board 18
East Deals
N-S Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ×S♣ 459905.000.001-Schramm-Miller vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
4 N♠ A56503.501.502-Larsson-Marini vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
4 N♠ A56503.501.504-Busby-Busby vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
5 ♠×W A−35002.003.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 1-Crouch-Breen
2 N 752001.004.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 2-Russell-Russell
3 N♠ K41700.005.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 6-Watson-Moore

Board 19
South Deals
E-W Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 ♠E 8−11004.500.504-Busby-Busby vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
4 ♠E 5−11004.500.505-Weeks-Bowcock vs 6-Watson-Moore
2 ♠E 531402.003.001-Schramm-Miller vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
3 ♠E 231402.003.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 1-Crouch-Breen
3 ♠E 431402.003.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 2-Russell-Russell
4 ♠E♣ A46200.005.002-Larsson-Marini vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle

Board 20
West Deals
Both Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 S♠ Q31405.000.001-Schramm-Miller vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
1 NTN 421203.501.502-Larsson-Marini vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
1 NTN 521203.501.503-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 1-Crouch-Breen
2 N♣ Q21102.003.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 6-Watson-Moore
4 S♠ Q−11000.504.504-Busby-Busby vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
4 S♠ Q−11000.504.506-Ransom-Ransom vs 2-Russell-Russell

Board 21
North Deals
N-S Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
6 W♠ 2−1505.000.001-Schramm-Miller vs 2-Russell-Russell
3 NTE 844304.001.004-Busby-Busby vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
4 W♣ 1054503.002.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 6-Watson-Moore
3 NTE♣ 254601.503.505-Weeks-Bowcock vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
3 NTE♠ 1064601.503.506-Ransom-Ransom vs 1-Crouch-Breen
3 NTE 275200.005.002-Larsson-Marini vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon

Board 22
East Deals
E-W Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 E 8−22004.500.502-Larsson-Marini vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
3 E 8−22004.500.504-Busby-Busby vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
3 E♣ 4−11003.002.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 6-Watson-Moore
3 ♠N A−1502.003.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 1-Crouch-Breen
2 E♣ 82901.004.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
2 W♣ A31400.005.001-Schramm-Miller vs 2-Russell-Russell

Board 23
South Deals
Both Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
2 NTS♣ 721204.500.502-Larsson-Marini vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
1 NTS♣ 721204.500.503-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 6-Watson-Moore
1 NTS J1903.002.004-Busby-Busby vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
2 ♣W K2901.503.501-Schramm-Miller vs 2-Russell-Russell
2 ♣W K2901.503.505-Weeks-Bowcock vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle
3 N♣ J−22000.005.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 1-Crouch-Breen

Board 24
West Deals
None Vul

ContractByLeadMadeScoresMatchpointsPairs
    N-SE-WN-SE-W 
4 W♣ 10−21005.000.006-Ransom-Ransom vs 1-Crouch-Breen
4 W A−1503.002.001-Schramm-Miller vs 2-Russell-Russell
4 W♠ A−1503.002.002-Larsson-Marini vs 4-Chelswick-Reardon
4 W♣ 10−1503.002.003-Boothroyd-Boothroyd vs 6-Watson-Moore
5 N A−1501.004.004-Busby-Busby vs 3-Sobieniak-Lamontagne
4 W♣ 1044200.005.005-Weeks-Bowcock vs 5-Leveque-Van Sickle